Hypocrisy slash homophobia alert #7126438.3

*neee-naaaw-neee-naaaw-neee-naaaw*

So anyways, this picture – of the cover of the new ish of Gay Times-ery – has been banned on London’s glittering Tube.

Er, d'you mind!

Mais, pourqoui?

Because one of the models was in, and-we-quoteth, ‘an unnecessary state of undress’.

*shudders*

Oh but irony of ironicals, the issue in question is only the Freedom issue, in celebration of the 40th anniversary of the legalisation of bumming.

‘In our opinion, their refusal is totally unjustified considering some of the heterosexual ads on display at the moment,’ said a spokesman for Gay Times. ‘The Freedom issue is all about celebrating… the fact couples of the same sex have the same rights as heterosexual couples.’

‘Tis true.

Nice bit of publicity, all the same.

Now let’s look at a picture of a famous, also in an ‘unnecessary state of undress’.

So unnecessary.

Thanks.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

More dolly #content:

6 comments to “Hypocrisy slash homophobia alert #7126438.3”

  1. Ooh, the irony. The Tube people are always hyper sensitive about what gets advertised down there. They should spend more energy on making sure their highly paid staff aren’t such total wankers.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  2. I’m surprised Ken hasn’t stepped in, he normally doesn’t stand for this kind of nonsense

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  3. Oh, for goodness sakes, it’s hardly hard-core is it? The sooner people get used to seeing boys together and girls together (without it being for Nuts), the sooner everyone will grow up a bit. It’s stoopid.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  4. It is quite a horny shot… What’s GT like these days? Haven’t read it in ages.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  5. It’s a good job. That picture would’ve caused instant bumming on tube platforms across the London

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  6. I was like, ‘Oh, but they let them put all those hetero ads up which are much raunchier than this’ but then I can’t actually think of any. Can anyone?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a comment