Another lame William Baker shoot for Kylie?

You can see her tits, fnar fnar

It’s too small for us to read the credits but this ‘risque’/’cutting edge’ picture of Kylie on the cover of Q (hang your heads in shame, Q people: you have laughed heartily at not only Kylie but at every woman who ever tried to make it in what for you is a men-only industry) smacks of stylist/gay husband/theatre director/ex-Boyz model William Baker…

Look at this other one after the jump if you don’t believe us. It has all the hallmarks of the nonsense we saw earlier on Glamour: simple ‘against white’, dated posing, complete lack of depth/imagination…

Creative genius
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

More dolly #content:

5 comments to “Another lame William Baker shoot for Kylie?”

  1. we need to see more of Kylie like the Lachappelle shoot she did a while back. Now THAT was fierce……..this is DRY

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  2. Yeah, or something really Diana-esque by Mario Testino. These boring old NewLook shoots are raaaahbish.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  3. Kylie has lost that nothing she had in the first place. What does that make her – minus nothing? double negative? even more completely pointless than she’s ever been?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  4. No amount of spin or tasteless exploitation of her disintegrating gay fanbase changes the fact that she is irrelevant in the mainstream and her new single sucks.

    Im ashamed of Q for putting her on the cover. Christ, next we’ll have Leona Lewis is a photoshoot on their cover.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  5. It’s sad, sad denouement don’t we think? Sad for her, mind. Not us. Night night.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a comment