Is it wrong we’re slightly turned on by this?

We need to talk.

When we say ‘turned on’, first off we’ll need to ditch the lady-boy on the left (their right), get Marc to take that ridiculous skirt off, ditto the ridiculous gladiator sandals (call yourself fash – that’s so a certain number of months ago); get him to remove the shirt by which time we’re guessing he’s naked (we’re assuming he’s doing the kilt thing to the letter, see); face him down on a nice John Lewis bed, then let nature take its course. By which time we may be slightly turned on. Sorry if that was misleading in any way.

Oh, and we haven’t seen the mug on the partially obscured bloke on the right (their left), but he can stay if he wants to.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

More dolly #content:

4 comments to “Is it wrong we’re slightly turned on by this?”

  1. Yes, it is. Though I quite enjoyed your soft-porn narrative.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  2. Listen, it’s fine. I too find Marc Jacobs bummable in or out of a purple skirt.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  3. He just can’t stop showing off his new body. First it was never knowingly not shirtless, now he’s worked his way down to the legs. He’ll be going out in Speedos next. Which I’d probably enjoy.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  4. OMG, Sorry Victoria, you just look plain NASTY!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a comment