Without the outrage, it wouldn’t be a Calvin Klein jeans ad, now, would it?

The outrage!

Remember the young-looking models in 70s porn-esque scenarios that were so ‘outrageous’ that even President Clinton commented? You know, the Uncle Calvin ones? Fake wood panelling? Ringing any bells? Well, it was just the latest in a long line of shock ads from CK to sell what is basically perfectly serviceable unglamorous jeanage. There was an underage Brooke Shields where nothing came between her and her Calvins.

Now New York is agog over this ad here where it seems to suggest young people have group sex. Or at least laze around together watching Coronation Street on a dodgy sofa with a girl having taken her top off. Or devil worship. Or something.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

More dolly #content:

5 comments to “Without the outrage, it wouldn’t be a Calvin Klein jeans ad, now, would it?”

  1. I think they need to up the outrage stakes, don’t you? I’m so un-outraged by this I might have to go out and do something outrageous. Instead of staying in and watching Coronation Street, which was my original plan.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  2. Lulu, join me – I’m heading down to Calvin Klein on the King’s Road to daub ‘outrage me, bitches’ on their walls in my own excrement.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  3. Severe lack of peenage on floor-boy.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  4. Yup … time to up the ante … suggested gay arse rimming, methinks!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  5. hahah lucky gal huh?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a comment