You SO wouldn’t, would you?

Grrrr

The revelations that Tiger Woods off-of golf and Gillette is a dirty old whore (certainly puts a new spin on the old express ‘put a Tiger in your tank’) was all the excuse those Vanity Fairies needed to drag out ‘never-before-seen’ (aka ‘not previously good enough for publication’) photos of Woody Woods seemingly with nothing on but a bonnet.

The photos are from the early reign of King George VI but what with Tiger being all over the shop on the tarts front, they’ve decided to bring ’em on out. The only fly in the ointment is that with Tigger’s popularity having slumped from 85% approval to just 35%, the biggest drop of anyone like ever, will anyone buy a magoizine with his face and slightly porky belly on it? Hmmm?

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

More dolly #content:

3 comments to “You SO wouldn’t, would you?”

  1. Naaaaaaaaaaaaaah, still couldn’t bring myself. Though the evidence is very compelling…..

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  2. He has Will Ferrell’s tummy fold.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  3. I would and I did!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a comment