This is after ‘38% visual enhancement in size’


male enhancement pants, marks and spencer

Looking more like a perky vagina than a penis that has benefited from a ‘38% visual enhancement in size’, this is in fact a penis that has benefited from a ‘38% visual enhancement in size’.

It is all thanks to Marks and Spencer’s new – that’s brand new to you – Bodymax pants, that offer a ‘38% visual enhancement in size’. Why not 39%? Or 37%?

Anyway, it’s all done via an ‘integral shelf’. What other sort of shelf would it be?

Anyway 2, they’re on sale from 15th October and they’ll cost £10 a pop. There’s another pant in the range with does the same for the back bottom, where ‘seam-free tailoring’ lifts the the ‘wearer’s posterior by a fifth’.  Those will set you back £15.

So they can get the cock-lift down to a very specific 38%, yet the arse is a round fifth. Seems a little unfair to us.

Erm, what else can we say… Wimpy is not what it was, is it?

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

More dolly #content:

6 comments to “This is after ‘386 visual enhancement in size’”

  1. black pants are rubbish anyway: you can’t see anything. I think the only reason they seem to be particularly popular with straight boys – a conclusion I reached after extensive research – is that you can’t see when they’re dirty. Don’t approve of is this hoiking and packing and padding though.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  2. i don’t need this appliance of science thank you. my cock’s huge anyway.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  3. Wimpy benders are rather tasty.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  4. “38% of nothing is still nothing” – quote from famed journalist Peaches Heroin-Chic Geldof.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  5. The backside is very nice! :-)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  6. this is what mike “the situation” was wearing in the pic you posted of him.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a comment