This is apparently a men’s undergarment. For men. Of the male variety. With cocks.


Those clever Aussies, when they’re not winning medals at the Commonwealth Games (how good are they at sports!) they are thinking up new ways for homosexualists to show off their junk in skimpy… let’s just call it underwear and leave it there, shall we. No need for unpleasantness.

But we think that with Croota, they may have gone a panty-girdle too far. Honestly, people! High-cut panties for the gents! What were you thi… Hold on. Actually, you might have a point. As you were.

Jump the jump if you want to see it/them in all its/their glory/glories…

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 6.7/10 (6 votes cast)

This is apparently a men's undergarment. For men. Of the male variety. With cocks., 6.7 out of 10 based on 6 ratings

More dolly #content:

13 comments to “This is apparently a men’s undergarment. For men. Of the male variety. With cocks.”

  1. Gawd awful hideous.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  2. They’re a bit Katy Perry, aren’t they? By which I mean ‘whoreish’.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  3. Mmmm, no.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  4. I suspect wearing these would create te worse kind of 19 Year Old Gay Face to transform one’s visage.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  5. jeez honey, wax much?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  6. if i had the body of an 11 year old…. i still wouldn’t.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  7. yuk poof!!
    That’s not exactly a man’s body – looks quite pre-buscent!!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  8. No bum = no bumming

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  9. I’m all for an exposed male buttock but no, just no. These are awful.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  10. maybe on Francois Sagat but not on that crack whore!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  11. If it’s for men, they must be under-endowed! I couldn’t possibly wear them – my junk would fall out the sides…

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  12. He looks weird. His torso looks way too long, and his pelvis way too tiny. It’s almost freakishly hypermasculine.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  13. Brandon, that’s called “teenage”.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a comment